10th Dimension Paranormal Group

ORBS IN RESEARCH - "IF IN DOUBT, CHECK IT OUT"! 

I'm not sure what we have here but what we do know is that this doorway was normal when Edna took these pictures. Is it a porthole opening  on the second picture below?  We captured this pretty gold/brown orb in the same room.  Then the next picture shows what appears to be something opening in the door frame, was it that gold/brown orb? Then two shadow figures appear to be standing in the doorway with Pam walking towards them. We realize that a lot of people do not believe in orbs or disregards them as something else and that is fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I just want to point out I believe in orbs and think that somehow or someway they are very connected to the paranormal. That "saying" you hear from some groups " If in doubt, throw it out" to me is a bunch of crap. It should be "If in doubt, check it out"! Don't disregard something because you don't believe or can't explain it or justify it. In police work or investigations all evidence is reviewed and you go thru the process of elimination before you throw it out, you check out the same evidence numerous times sometimes before you throw it out, but it is reviewed. We are looking for patterns or trends just like real life investigations that have physical evidence you can touch, see or smell. Not all of that is available during a ghost investigation but when you have the opportunity to prove something, then why not use it. It may be a few investigations down the road and you realize that you had seen the same evidence in a previous investigation or it may be years down the road. Then you start adding your old investigations evidence with your new  and you do start to see a pattern. That would or should help you in future investigations or make it where you can explain it better for the new investigators just starting. Maybe it's the law enforcement side of me but I really think unless you know something that the rest of the world doesn't know, check it out, debunk it. You're suppose to be a paranormal investigation group that is looking for answers or you wouldn't be doing this.  Do not disregard some evidence because someone on t.v doesn't believe it's for them. That is like forming an opinion on someone or something before you ever meet or even encounter it. Who knows, that person the other party just didn't like is now a good friend of yours, just because it's someone else's opinion  doesn't mean it's right, does not exist or can be researched.  So saying this, you will see a lot of orbs in some of our investigations or should I say what we think are orbs.  We know there can be dust, water drops, smoke or whatever but we check it out and eliminate it so we think it could very well be an orb related to that investigation. Seems like all investigators want that perfect picture of a full blown ghost and some have been lucky but they are few and far in-between. So most of the picture evidence we tend to get is of orbs or mist and once in a while some great full entities.

Sorry if I got carried away on orbs there or disregarded evidence because of what they think should not be investigated, but I'm a firm believer that if we already had firm evidence or proof of what everything is or means in the paranormal or supernatural world then we wouldn't have all these people trying to find  evidence, answers or proof of afterlife existence. I'm not saying I'm right about orbs but after some of the things I have encountered, seen and heard  I'm seeking more answers and I think orbs are truly part of  our research. Don't just throw orbs out of the picture - " If in doubt, check it out". How can it hurt?  I've seen, heard and felt many things I just can't prove or explain sometimes but I keep going back for more, mostly for confirmation of what happened yesterday, last year or ten years ago just to make sure it was not my imagination. I will always be open to this incredible field of research while here on earth and maybe get some answers in this lifetime that will help in the next. It can't hurt.

Again, this is my opinion, Hector the co-founder of the 10th Dimension Paranormal Group. We'll present our evidence and you the client or the investigator  can decide what you think of it, comment on it, debunk it based on your experience;  I and the 10th are just sharing what we think is reviewable information or evidence. The final decision on what you think it is, is all yours. 

If we can be of any help, please feel free to contact us. Thanks and enjoy  your investigative journey.

 This is a picture of what we think is the brown/gold orb in the dining room area.

The sequence is pretty incredible. The picture above was captured as it was forming. Notice the door frame appears normal on the right of this reddish/gold mist.

Now look at the doorway, there appears to be a dark shadow of a ghost in a dark robe or dress. There also seems to be another ghost just to the right of it  just behind the door frame. Could it be a father figure putting his arm around the little spirit ? What do you think?

As Edna was walking towards the next room, she felt compelled to take a photo of this end of the room.  She thought that something was in the closet and was lucky enough to get these photos. We have had some very strange EVPS in this room and not just words but whole conversations that sounded like someone was speaking thru an old 40's microphone, very distorted, you can make out it was a female and she was saying something but what we haven't figured out what yet. We do know all the ghost and spirits in this building are harmless. They just want to communicate and seem to enjoy our company. 

 AGREEING TO DISAGREE -  That is one of our  main rules for our group. We have so many pictures, incidents, encounters or feelings during an investigation that we need to discuss what is what. What could have caused it? Who was there? weather? How was the equipment used or who was using it? Who took the picture and with what camera? There are a ton of things that we as a paranormal group go thru trying to decide what is worth reviewing and what we would like to present as a group and believe me, some of those discussion can get pretty animated but in the end we decide what to do with our evidence. I'm talking about items that are very questionable not the obvious. We as a group have members that take a lot of pride on what they do and being as honest as we can be makes that evidence  much easier to present. We always try to ask "what do you think?" 

The process of elimination can be a long tedious job but we think we have done our best to present to you what we think is worth presenting and not everyone agrees, not even in the group, but we need a majority vote from most members involved in the investigation to put it out there.  There are times that we need to return to the site just to maybe look at one picture hanging on a wall or whatever the reason but we truly try to give the public what we think is good, solid information and evidence. Now we know that there are things we can present that appear very easy to debunk in a picture but there is that other part of the incident that may not be in that picture. Like a cold spot or voices or sounds that the picture can not captured. It may sound or look like nothing but when you have a picture of a mist or orb next to a door it may mean nothing, but when you hear that the door the orb is next  to just slammed and there are voices coming from that door and we have nobody there then that changes the whole thing and trying to present that can be hard at times and then some people will not believe you. There are people out there that don't believe in the paranormal, even if a ghost walked up to them and shook their hand, but that's what keeps everyone honest about what and how they present their evidence.  A lot goes into an investigation but in the end  what you present reflects on your groups ability to be believable and honest. We do not claim to know a lot about the paranormal. we still investigate on faith, our beliefs and opinions but it is reviewed and processed so we do put out what we believe to be something that is hard to explain. Not being present during an investigation does make it hard for those that are skeptical. Then there are those just looking for the opportunity to make a group look bad or try to debunk everything no matter what.  That's fine, it's their lose, that's why we agree to disagree.